Mel Gibson Criticizes Netflix and Amazon for Banning Sound of Freedom

Hollywood icon Mel Gibson has voiced strong criticism against major streaming platforms Netflix and Amazon for allegedly refusing to stream the film Sound of Freedom, a movie that tackles the urgent issue of child trafficking. His statements have reignited debates about censorship, industry biases, and Hollywood’s influence over controversial narratives.

Hollywood’s Relevance in Question

During a recent interview, Gibson questioned the influence and relevance of Hollywood, stating that many filmmakers are now working independently due to the industry’s restrictive nature. He compared Hollywood’s filtering process to a “kidney,” suggesting that content must pass through selective gates before reaching the public.

His remarks have gained traction amid claims that Netflix and Amazon rejected Sound of Freedom, a film widely praised by audiences but shunned by major studios. The film, which tells the story of a former government agent rescuing children from human traffickers, has sparked widespread discussion about its exclusion from mainstream distribution.

The Struggle to Release Sound of Freedom

Originally produced by 20th Century Fox before Disney’s acquisition, Sound of Freedom was shelved after Disney took over. The film’s producers, including Eduardo Verástegui, fought to regain the rights and sought distribution through Netflix and Amazon. However, both streaming giants allegedly refused to release the film, leaving its fate uncertain until Angel Studios stepped in.

Verástegui shared his frustration, revealing that he personally reached out to various Hollywood executives and streaming platforms, only to be ignored or rejected. At one point, he even considered making the film available for free online. Fortunately, Angel Studios took on the project, paving the way for its theatrical release.

Box Office Success Amidst Industry Opposition

Despite industry roadblocks, Sound of Freedom has defied expectations at the box office. Within two weeks of its release, the film grossed approximately $85.5 million—an impressive feat given its modest $14.5 million budget. It even outperformed big-budget Hollywood blockbusters like Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

The film’s financial success has been largely driven by word-of-mouth marketing, grassroots campaigns, and audience advocacy. Viewers have responded with standing ovations in theaters, reinforcing its impact and message.

Media and Public Reaction

While Sound of Freedom has been embraced by many, it has also faced significant criticism from mainstream media outlets. Some publications, including Rolling Stone and The Guardian, have dismissed it as “QAnon-adjacent” and accused it of promoting conspiracy theories. Lead actor Jim Caviezel, known for his role in The Passion of the Christ, has also been scrutinized for his past comments on child trafficking and alleged support for controversial theories.

However, many supporters argue that the film highlights a real and pressing issue—child trafficking—and should not be dismissed based on ideological divides. Critics of Hollywood point out an apparent double standard, noting that Netflix previously backed the controversial film Cuties, which was widely condemned for its depiction of young girls in provocative scenes.

Public Backlash Against Streaming Giants

News of Netflix and Amazon rejecting Sound of Freedom has sparked outrage among audiences. YouTuber Matt Wallace took to social media to accuse the platforms of censorship, and many users have since called for boycotts.

While neither Netflix nor Amazon has provided an official statement on their decision, speculation continues to grow regarding why the film was denied distribution on such influential platforms.

Final Thoughts

The controversy surrounding Sound of Freedom underscores the growing divide between Hollywood and audiences seeking alternative narratives. As independent films gain momentum through unconventional means, the industry’s traditional gatekeeping may become less effective. Whether or not mainstream studios will reconsider their stance remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—audiences are making their voices heard, and Sound of Freedom is not a film they are willing to ignore.